Adnan Syed: Conviction overturned in Serial podcast murder case

By Sam Cabral

BBC News, Washington

Media caption,

Smiling Adnan Syed is cheered as his conviction is tossed

A judge has quashed a Baltimore man’s murder conviction in a case that spawned hit true crime podcast Serial.

Adnan Syed was 19 when he was sentenced to life in prison for the death of his ex-girlfriend, Hae Min Lee, whose body was found buried in the woods in 1999.

Prosecutors last week asked the court to throw out his conviction, saying a year-long case review had turned up two “alternative suspects”.

Syed will be released into home detention.

Now 41, his shackles were taken off in court on Monday after nearly 23 years behind bars.

Baltimore Circuit Judge Melissa Phinn said she was vacating his conviction “in the interest of fairness and justice”, adding the state had failed to share evidence that could have helped his defence at trial.

The decision does not mean Syed is innocent. Judge Phinn has ordered a new trial.

A jury found Syed guilty in 2000 of premeditated murder, kidnapping, robbery and false imprisonment.

Prosecutors argued he was a scorned lover who strangled Lee, his classmate at Woodlawn High School, and – with the help of a friend – hid her body in Baltimore’s Leakin Park. They relied in part on mobile phone location data that has since been proven unreliable.

Every appeal Syed has filed over the past two decades has been denied, including his most recent attempt in 2019.

It was the 2014 podcast Serial that focused worldwide attention on the case and cast doubt on Syed’s guilt. Episodes of the show have been downloaded more than 340 million times. The case has also spawned other works, including an HBO docuseries in 2019.

The Baltimore State’s Attorney’s Office, which studied the case over the past year alongside Syed’s latest defence attorney, said on Wednesday that he “deserves a new trial”.

Prosecutors said they lacked “confidence in the integrity of the conviction” and had identified two new potential suspects who were known to police since the 1999 murder.

Neither suspect has been named, but officials said both had documented records of violence towards women, including convictions that occurred after Syed’s trial. One suspect was cleared from the investigation into Lee’s death after failing a lie-detector test, a method no longer admissible in many US courts.

“Our prosecutors have been sworn to not only aggressively advocate on behalf of victims of crime but when the evidence exists to exonerate those that have been falsely accused and convicted,” lead prosecutor Marilyn Mosby said outside the court.

She was interrupted by loud cheers as Syed exited the building through a scrum of cameras and supporters.

Before the ruling, the victim’s brother told the court on Monday through tears that he was “not against the investigation”, but had been blind-sided by prosecutors.

“Everyday when I think it’s over… or it’s ended, it always comes back. It’s killing me,” said Young Lee.

“This is not a podcast for me. This is real life – a never-ending nightmare for 20-plus years.”

Steve Kelly, a victim’s rights lawyer for the family, said the Lees had been “shut out of the legal process” and were “deeply disappointed” with the way they had been treated.

“All they wanted was information,” said Mr Kelly. “If the truth is that somebody else killed their daughter, they want to know that more than anyone.”

Read More

Affiliate disclosure: The links contained in this product review may result in a small commission if you opt to purchase the product recommended at no additional cost to you. This goes towards supporting our research and editorial team and please know we only recommend high quality products.

Disclaimer: Please understand that any advice or guidelines revealed here are not even remotely a substitute for sound medical advice from a licensed healthcare provider. Make sure to consult with a professional physician before making any purchasing decision if you use medications or have concerns following the review details shared above. Individual results may vary as the statements made regarding these products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. The efficacy of these products has not been confirmed by FDA-approved research. These products are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.